Legal Opinion

Gershenhorn v. Walter R. Stutz Enterprises

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1956No. 3981PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*295OPINION

By the Court, Badt, J.:

In this action, by a landlord for a declaration of the rights of the parties under a lease and option, for a cancellation of the lease, restitution of the premises and damages, the main questions presented on this appeal are as follows: (1) Is there substantial evidence to support the trial court’s findings that the building, which the lessors agreed to construct, was substantially completed and ready for occupancy in accordance with the agreement of the parties; that the lessees entered into occupancy thereof and that the lessees were in default in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Meyercheck v. GivensCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  2. Friendly v. LarsenNevada Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Murfee v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. United States v. T. W. Corder, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  5. Sharp v. Twin Lakes CorporationNevada Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Richfield Oil Corp. v. Harbor Insurance Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Schwartz v. SchwartzNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  3. American Fence, Inc. v. WhamNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Hennessey v. PriceNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Simon v. SchaboNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API