Legal Opinion

Edith P. Goodwin v. Hartford Life Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 14, 1974No. 73-1645PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

This is a diversity action, in which the plaintiff-appellee has sued the appellant-insurance company to recover as the beneficiary of her deceased husband who was allegedly covered by a group life insurance policy issued to the Ever-Soft Company of Pennsylvania as policyholder. Pennsylvania law is applicable.

The district court found that the deceased husband, though enrolled under the policy, was never eligible for coverage. This conclusion was based on the fact that eligibility under the policy was limited to “active full-time employees” of the Ever-Soft Company and this,…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nesbitt v. Erie Coach Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Brown v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Albert v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Watt EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. YELLOW C. CO. of P. v. Carpol R. Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

4Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mattia v. Employers Mutual CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Aluminum Co. of America v. Essex Group, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Drexel Burnham Lambert Inc. And David Joe Ragan v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and Sansom Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  4. Temp-Way Corp. v. R.M. Shoemaker Co. (In Re Temp-Way Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Schuylkill Products, Inc. v. H. Rupert & Sons, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API