Legal Opinion
Bell v. Uribe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 5, 2013No. Nos. 11-56768, 11-56771PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TALLMAN, Judge.
ORDER
The opinion filed on September 5, 2013, is amended. The amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order.
With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc filed in appeal number 11-56771.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc in appeal number 11-56771 are DENIED. No further petitions for panel rehearing…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. Terry ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Martin Kipp v. Ron DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Davis v. McCollumCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Raymone Bain v. MJJ Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Graham v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.