Legal Opinion

Trout v. City of Herrin

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 31, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boggs

Separate suits were instituted by appellees, W. Z. Trout, Thomas Kilpatrick, E. C. Frick, John Stallions, Monroe Smith, A. F. Eicherson and Jacob Jones, against appellant in the city court of Herrin, to recover for salaries alleged to be due them, respectively, for services rendered said city as policemen. By agreement of parties, a jury was waived and said causes were consolidated and tried together. The court found the issues for appellees, respectively, and rendered judgments thereon against the city. To reverse said judgments, this appeal is prosecuted.

The record discloses that the mayor…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bullis v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Stott v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Kenneally v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Moon v. MayorIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Miller v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Evanston v. PiotrowiczIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Siegel ex rel. American Glass Co. v. Liberty Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1933
  3. People ex rel. Janosky v. NovotnyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934
  4. Transcontinental Insurance v. RosenbloomAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API