Legal Opinion

Siegel ex rel. American Glass Co. v. Liberty Trust & Savings Bank

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 10, 1933No. Gen. No. 36,461PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gridley

In a garnishment proceeding, commenced April 24, 1931, in which two claimants of the fund intervened, there was a trial of the issues without a jury in September, 1932, resulting in the court finding in substance as follows: That there is a fund in the hands of the garnishee (hereinafter called the Liberty Bank) as shown by its additional answer, in the sum of $2,920.03; that of this fund the beneficial plaintiff (American Glass Co.) is entitled to $1,360.50; and that Hyman J. Rosenberg, intervening claimant, is entitled to the balance of the fund, or $1,559.53. On September 9, 1932,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miller v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Murry Nelson & Co. v. LeiterIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Third National Bank v. NorrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Climax Tag Co. v. American Tag Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Vardaman Shoe Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1943
  2. United States of America, in Intervention-Appellee v. Crest Finance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
  3. General Telephone Co. of Illinois v. American Casualty Co. of ReadingDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API