Legal Opinion

Graham v. Annis

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 10, 1915No. Civ. No. 1399PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Solano County and from an order refusing to dissolve an attachment. A. J. Buckles, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

Plaintiff alleges in his complaint that defendant is the owner of “that certain gasoline motor boat named ‘The Bird,’ ” and that “between the 12th day of May .and the 21st day of September, 1914, at the special instance and request of defendant, H. 0. Annis, plaintiff performed certain labor in making certain repairs to the machinery of said motor boat, ‘ The Bird, ’ and to a small gasoline motor, the property of defendant, and provided certain materials which were used in the making of said repairs.” It is also alleged that “said labor and materials were of the reasonable value of $320.50”…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Porter v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Fisk v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Hill v. GrigsbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Jensen v. DorrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States of Mexico v. RaskCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Islander Yachts, Inc. v. One Freeport 36-Foot VesselCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. D'Alessandro v. PickfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Crofton v. PappasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Kaminski v. WalpoleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API