Legal Opinion
Mullady v. Goord
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 29, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioner was charged with violating various inmate rules as a result of his possession of a piece of Plexiglas, which he had cut from a larger piece of Plexiglas in the weld shop. Petitioner contends that the determination is not supported by substantial evidence because there is no direct evidence that he possessed the Plexiglas. Contrary to petitioner’s contention, a determination may be supported by evidence that is entirely circumstantial (see, Matter of Mullen v Goord, 267 AD2d 1040; Matter of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People ex rel. Vega v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Cowart v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Hawkins v. CoombeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Lonski ex rel. Colby v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Fereira v. CoombeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hernandez v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Santana v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Poblah v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000