Dunsbach v. Hollister
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from circuit court, Saratoga county. Action for damages by Naomi Dunsbach against William H. Hollister for the maintenance of a nuisance, and an injunction restraining its further continuance. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLandon, J.
The defendant, a dealer in moulding sand, for several years constantly kept a large pile of it deposited upon hiá own lot, adjoining the Brie canal, in the village of Crescent. The sand was obtained in the vicinity, and deposited by defendant upon his lot, to be sent by canal to his various customers. Directly across the highway from this pile of sand is the plaintiff’s house. This is large and substantial, and is and has been occupied by the plaintiff and her family for a number of years. The pile of sand usually *95covers a space of about 170 by 35 feet, and varies in height from 8 to 15 feet.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Losee v. . BuchananNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Bellinger v. . the New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Vanderwiele v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Uline v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Seymour v. . FellowsNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- McCarty v. . Natural Carbonic Gas Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Uggla v. BrokawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- McNulty v. Ludwig & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Indiana Pipe Line Co. v. ChristensenIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
- Alabama Western Railroad v. WilsonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.