Legal Opinion
Ronald Majewski v. Gene Fischi
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 30, 2010No. 09-2919UnpublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARRY, Circuit Judge.
I
Because we write only for the parties, we set forth only the facts relevant to the various claims. Ronald Majewski began working at the Luzerne County Correctional Facility (“LCCF”) in 1991. In 1994, he suffered a work-related injury. In October 2000, he returned to work as a control booth guard — a permanent light-duty job created for him. Because his col leagues were apparently envious of his light-duty position, in June 2002, they circulated a grievance complaining that his employment created safety issues. Ma-jewski informed Warden Gene Fischi of the grievance…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Richard M. Wishkin v. John E. Potter, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Hill v. City of ScrantonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sampson v. Methacton School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Solomon v. School District of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Donegan v. LivingstonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- O'Donnell v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Willis v. Norristown Area School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.