Legal Opinion

New England Capital Corp. v. Finlay Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 20, 1993No. 91-567PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The defendant, The Finlay Company, Inc., appeals an order of the Hooksett District Court (LaPointe, J.) precluding *227Christopher Finlay from appearing on behalf of the defendant in post-judgment proceedings. We reverse and remand.

In 1986, the defendant and Prime Financial Group, Inc. entered into a lease agreement for office equipment. Prime Financial later assigned the lease to the plaintiff, New England Capital Corporation. In 1989, the defendant defaulted in its monthly payments under the lease agreement, causing the plaintiff to repossess and sell the office equipment. In 1991, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. SettleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marchant v. U.S. Collections West, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 1998
  2. Appeal of Campaign for Ratepayers' RightsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  3. Morriss v. Towle Hill Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  4. Allied v. HerrmannDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1995
  5. Amy M. et al. v. Timberlane Sch.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API