Legal Opinion
Appeal of Campaign for Ratepayers' Rights
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided November 23, 1993No. 92-329PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C. J.
Campaign for Ratepayers’ Rights (CRR) appeals an order of the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (PUC). The PUC denied CRR’s request for a finding of eligibility for compensation under New Hampshire Administrative Rules, Puc Part 205 (Puc Part 205) and the Public Utilities Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, 16 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2645 (1978) (PURPA or act). The PUC also ruled that CRR was required to be represented by legal counsel to gain full intervenor status in the proceedings. We affirm.
In 1992, the New Hampshire Electric Cooperative (NHEC) filed a plan of reorganization in the United…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Denver Bar Association v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
- Public Service Commission v. Hahn Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Proctor v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Silva v. BotschSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Graham v. Davis County Solid Waste Management & Energy Recovery Special Service DistrictCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
- Life Science Church v. Shawano CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
- Amy M. et al. v. Timberlane Sch.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2000
- Dressel v. AmeribankMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Dressel v. AmeribankMichigan Supreme Court · 2003