Legal Opinion
Nutrena Mills, Inc. v. Earle
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided October 31, 1961PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*465Martin, C. J.
The question is whether a person who signs a contract, but is not named in the body of it, is a party to the contract and bound by its terms.
In 17 C. J. S., Contracts, p. 803, sec. 346, it is stated:
“The signatures cannot alone be looked to for the purpose of determining who are the parties to a written contract; . . . while persons have been held liable as parties to the contract where they have signed their names thereto, although they are not elsewhere mentioned in it, in order that such a construction may be adopted it is necessary that the intention be apparent from the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Shriner v. CraftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Sun Oil Co. v. OswellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Brown v. O'ByrneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Strange v. McCallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Perlman v. PerlmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brush v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
- In re Estate of DickersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
- St. Regis Apartment Corp. v. SweitzerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- James Julian, Inc. v. State Highway AdministrationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Caplan v. StantSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.