Legal Opinion

James Julian, Inc. v. State Highway Administration

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 10, 1985No. 946, September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALPERT, Judge.

It is axiomatic that, within reasonable limits, parties to a contract may mutually select their remedies for breaches or differences arising out of the performance of the contract. In this appeal, we must decide whether the choice of words used by sophisticated parties in selecting the remedies precluded the parties from litigation before exhausting the procedures provided in the contract. The sophisticated parties are James Julian, Inc., appellant (“Julian”), the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore (“the City”) and allegedly the State Highway Administration, Department of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Truck Insurance Exchange v. Marks Rentals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Kasten Construction Co. v. Rod Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc., a Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  5. Griffith v. ScheungrabCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Promenade Towers Mutual Housing Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Glenda Pope v. Bethesda Health Center, Inc., Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
  3. Gebhardt & Smith LLP v. Maryland Port AdministrationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. Shook of West Virginia, Inc. v. York City Sewer AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Olney Associates, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API