Legal Opinion

Perlman v. Perlman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 25, 1913No. Gen. No. 18,282PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Henry C. Beitusb, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1912.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Clark

delivered the opinion of the court.

This suit, as appears from the statement of claim was brought for $750 as liquidated damages, alleged to have accrued to the plaintiff by reason of the breach of a certain contract for the exchange of real estate, alleged to have been entered into between the plaintiff and the two defendants. There was a trial before the court without a jury, and a finding in favor of the plaintiff for $100. The case is brought to this court by the plaintiff for review, the error alleged being that the finding and judgment should have been for $750.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nutrena Mills, Inc. v. EarleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Nutrena Mills, Inc. v. EarleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API