Legal Opinion
Blaker v. State Board of Chiropractic Examiners
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided September 30, 1998No. 1259, Sept. Term, 1997PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BYRNES, Judge.
F. Keen Blaker, D.C. appeals a judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County affirming the finding by the Board of Chiropractic Examiners (“Board”) that he violated the Maryland Chiropractic Act, Md.Code (1994 Repl.Vol.), § 3-313(9) of the Health Occupations Article (“H.O.”), by rendering “professionally incompetent” treatment to a particular patient. 1 Dr. Blaker presents the following questions for review, which we have renumbered and slightly rephrased:
I. Were Dr. Blaker’s due process rights violated because H.O. § 3-313(9) is void for vagueness?
II. Was the Board’s…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. People's CounselCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Finucan v. Maryland Board of Physician Quality AssuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Finucan v. Maryland State Board of Physician Quality AssuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- State Board of Physicians v. BernsteinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Cornfeld v. State Board of PhysiciansCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Neutron Products, Inc. v. Department of the EnvironmentCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.