Legal Opinion

Finucan v. Maryland State Board of Physician Quality Assurance

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 25, 2003No. 1891, Sept. Term, 2001PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, J.

This case presents the question whether the Board of Physician Quality Assurance (“the Board”) could reasonably conclude that a physician’s having consensual sexual relations with adult patients, at times and locations other than those involving the immediate act of diagnosis or treatment, is “immoral or unprofessional conduct in the practice of medicine” within the meaning of Maryland Code (1981, 2000 Repl. VoL), § 14-404(a)(3) of the Health Occupations Article. We hold that the Board could so conclude.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Appellant, Thomas E. Finucan, Jr., M.D., is a physician who from 1985…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Pons v. Ohio State Medical BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Matter of ConroySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  5. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. People's CounselCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Finucan v. Maryland Board of Physician Quality AssuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Halici v. City of GaithersburgCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. Casey v. Mayor of RockvilleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Dixon v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional ServicesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Carstarphen v. IveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API