King Motors, Inc. v. Delfino
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The question presented in this case is whether a provision in a contract for the payment of a certain sum of money constituted one for liquidated damages, as stated in it, or one for a penalty. The trial court gave judgment for the plaintiff to recover upon the former basis and the defendant has appealed.
The plaintiff is an automobile dealer. It has a franchise to sell Cadillac cars which provides, in effect, that, if a new car it sells becomes the property of a person not in its territory within a six-month period from the date of the sale, it has to pay a commission to the dealer in the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hayes v. O'BrienIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- May v. YoungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Cummings v. NielsonUtah Supreme Court · 1912
- Haussman v. BurnhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
- Banta v. Stamford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Vines v. Orchard Hills, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Norwalk Door Closer Co. v. Eagle Lock & Screw Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Berger v. ShanahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Ferrari v. Barclays American/Business Credit, Inc. (In Re Morse Tool, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
- Society for Savings v. BraggConnecticut Superior Court · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.