Legal Opinion

King Motors, Inc. v. Delfino

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 7, 1950PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

The question presented in this case is whether a provision in a contract for the payment of a certain sum of money constituted one for liquidated damages, as stated in it, or one for a penalty. The trial court gave judgment for the plaintiff to recover upon the former basis and the defendant has appealed.

The plaintiff is an automobile dealer. It has a franchise to sell Cadillac cars which provides, in effect, that, if a new car it sells becomes the property of a person not in its territory within a six-month period from the date of the sale, it has to pay a commission to the dealer in the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hayes v. O'BrienIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  2. May v. YoungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  3. Cummings v. NielsonUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Haussman v. BurnhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  5. Banta v. Stamford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Vines v. Orchard Hills, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Norwalk Door Closer Co. v. Eagle Lock & Screw Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  3. Berger v. ShanahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  4. Ferrari v. Barclays American/Business Credit, Inc. (In Re Morse Tool, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
  5. Society for Savings v. BraggConnecticut Superior Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API