Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. McCaskey

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 22, 1985No. F004415PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEST, J.

Does Government Code section 13967 as amended in 1983 apply to persons committing offenses between its effective date of September 27, 1983, and its operative date of January 1, 1984? We conclude that it does not.

Defendant pleaded nolo contendere to violating Vehicle Code sections 23153, subdivision (a), count I, 20002, subdivision (a), count in, and 14601, subdivision (a), count IV. The violations were all committed on November 24, 1983. In addition to imposing a prison sentence, the trial court ordered defendant to pay a restitution fine of $3,000 pursuant to Government Code…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. CaudilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. People v. BelleciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People Ex Rel. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Bush v. BrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Preston v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. CambaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Orange Unified Sch. Dist. v. Rancho Santiago Cmty. Coll. Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. People v. RowlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Russell v. Stanford University HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API