Legal Opinion
Henley v. Philip Morris Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 28, 2004No. A086991PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
9 Cal.Rptr.3d 29 (2004)
114 Cal.App.4th 1296
Patricia HENLEY, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
PHILIP MORRIS INC., Defendant and Appellant.
No. A086991.
Court of Appeal, First District, Division Four.
January 20, 2004.
Review Granted April 28, 2004.
Shook, Hardy & Bacon, Gerald V. Barron, Lucy E. Mason, San Francisco, Mordecai Dempsey Boone, Tampa, FL, Arnold & Porter, Ronald C. Redcay, Los Angeles, Murray R. Garnick, Robert A. McCarter, Washington, DC, for Appellant.
Law Offices of Daniel U. Smith, Daniel Upham Smith, Los Angeles, Ted W. Pelletier, Wartnick, Chaber, Harowitz, Smith & Tigerman, Harry F.…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Grisham v. Philip Morris U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Ansagay v. Dow Agrosciences LLCDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2015
- Jowers v. BOC Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2009
- Leslie J. Grisham v. Philip Morris U.S.A., a Corporation Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company Corp., Individually and as Successor to the American Tobacco Company and Its Predecessor in Interest, British American Tobacco Industries, Plc, Maria Cannata v. Philip Morris Usa, Inc., AKA Philip Morris Brown & Williamson Tobacco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Philip Morris Inc. v. HenleySupreme Court of the United States · 2005