Leary v. Manchester
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C. J.
As an outcome of the prior litigation the city seeks to obtain by eminent domain full title to the premises in which it now has an easement, on the ground that the expense of maintenance which the terms of the easement impose upon it as a continuing obligation will be substantially greater than the value of the plaintiff’s ownership. The novel situation is presented in which full title to property results in real economy in comparison with only an easement therein. The easement is of a right to build a ditch across the plaintiff’s land, and in part consideration for it the city agreed to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Housing Authority v. HigginbothamTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Matter of N.Y. City H. Authority v. MullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Stockus v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
3Cited by4 opinions
- D. Latchis, Inc. v. Borofsky Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- McInnis v. Town of HamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
- Brodeur v. City of ClaremontSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Turgeon v. City of SomersworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976