Legal Opinion
Fronning v. Blume
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 27, 1988No. C9-88-855PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Appellants brought an action alleging respondents fraudulently obtained a mortgage against appellants’ property and that respondents acted in bad faith by denying appellant future credit and refusing to release discretionary loan funds. The trial court granted respondents summary judgment on both issues. Appellants now seek relief. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS
Appellant Leslie Fronning and his wife Connie purchased a farm from Leslie’s parents Melvin and Alice Fronning in September 1977 and financed the purchase by a contract for deed. Leslie’s farm…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Northern Petrochemical Co. v. United States Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Johnson Building Co. v. River Bluff Development Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Wabasso State Bank v. Caldwell Packing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Hamilton v. BoyceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brown v. Founders Bank and Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Pako Corp. v. CitytrustDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- Brenowitz v. Central Nat. BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- PUFFN STUFF OF WINTER PARK v. BellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Carlson v. EstesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.