Gifford v. Casper Neon Sign Co., Inc.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, Justice.
This case comes to us upon direct appeal from a cognovit judgment, which, the appellant alleges, violates provisions of the Constitution of Wyoming and the United States Constitution. Appellee, in whose favor judgment was entered, counters with a two-stage argument: (1) Cognovit judgments are not, per se, unconstitutional; and (2) since no facts were developed in the trial court, the Wyoming Supreme Court may not decide whether, under the particular facts of this case, the cognovit judgment offends either the Wyoming Constitution or the Constitution of the United States. We…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- SWARB Et Al. v. LENNOX Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grand Island & Northern Wyoming Railroad v. BakerWyoming Supreme Court · 1896
- Greenough v. Prairie Dog Ranch, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1975
- Westring v. Cheyenne National BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- UNC Teton Exploration Drilling, Inc. v. PeytonWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Combs v. Sherry-CombsWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Stauffer Chemical Co. v. CurryWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Madrid v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Lystarczyk v. SmitsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.