Legal Opinion

Randolph v. First Baptist Church

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1954No. A-134017PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*101OPINION

By RENNER, J.

Immediately after the court had announced its decision, a verbal motion was made by counsel for the defendant, The First Baptist Church of Lockland, for separate findings of fact and conclusions of law, at which time they advised the court that they also wished to submit certain written interrogatories in connection therewith. Thereafter a written motion for separate findings of fact and conclusions of law and answers to interrogatories were filed. Plaintiff then filed objections to this motion, which objections were heard by the court and are considered and determined…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thomas v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. Moustakis v. Hellenic Orthodox SocietyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  3. Gray v. Christian SocietyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  4. Mitchell v. Church of ChristSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. State ex rel. Pittman v. AdamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Baugh v. ThomasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  2. Smith v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Gibraltar Mausoleum Corp. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Wright v. BayowskiOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Mullins v. WickerOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API