Legal Opinion
Frigillana v. Frigillana
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided July 9, 1979No. 78-97PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
John A. Fogleman, Justice.
The parties in this case were married for 29 years. On December 13, 1968, they entered into a “Property Settlement Agreement,” reciting the existence of marital differences, making it impossible for them to continue to live together. The agreement was signed in the Panama Canal Zone, where they resided. On January 10, 1969, an interlocutory decree of divorce was entered in the United States District Court for the Canal Zone. The court confirmed and approved the agreement between the parties in this decree. On July 30, 1969, a final decree was entered and the husband,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Warnock v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Lowenschuss v. KaneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Smith v. ZeppMontana Supreme Court · 1977
- Kama Rippa Music, Inc. v. SchekerykCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Paddock v. MasonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- City of Clinton, Ark. v. Pilgrim's Pride Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- Dews v. Halliburton Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Hofeldt v. MehlingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Wyeth, Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- United States v. Applied Pharmacy Consultants, Inc., and Charles ShusterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.