Legal Opinion
United States v. Applied Pharmacy Consultants, Inc., and Charles Shuster
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 9, 1999No. 97-4115PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichard S. Arnold, Circuit J.
The United States brought this action against Applied Pharmacy Consultants, Inc., and Charles Shuster, its principal officer and shareholder, to recover Medicare payments that were claimed to be in excess of the value of medical devices actually furnished by Applied. The theory of the case was that the United States was billed and paid for one sort of device, whereas in fact, another, less valuable, device was furnished. The District Court found the facts in favor of the United States and awarded judgment in the amount of about $242,000, the amount by which, according to the Court, payment to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Stencel Aero Engineering Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bob Klein v. Arkoma Production CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Frigillana v. FrigillanaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Campbell v. Asbury Automotive, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
- United States v. GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- In Re WatermanUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Hofeldt v. MehlingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Powers v. Lycoming EnginesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.