Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*404OPINION
RYAN, Justice.
¶ 1 This case requires us to determine whether Article 18, Section 5 of the Arizona Constitution, which provides that the defense “of assumption of risk shall, in all cases whatsoever, be a question of fact and shall, at all times, be left to the jury,” applies to an express contractual assumption of risk. We hold that it does.
I
¶ 2 Charles Phelps was a professional race-car driver who had participated in more than 100 races at Firebird Raceway, Inc. Before participating in a Firebird race, drivers must sign a “Release and Covenant Not to Sue” (“Release”) and a “Release…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
- Nixon v. Missouri Municipal LeagueSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Flagstaff Affordable Housing Ltd. Partnership v. Design Alliance, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2010
- 1800 OCOTILLO, LLC v. WLB Group, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2008
- Lincoln General Insurance Co. v. Detroit Diesel Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- John Munic Enterprises, Inc. v. LaosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Sonoran Desert Investigations, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.