Legal Opinion

Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 2005No. CV-04-0114-PRPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*404OPINION

RYAN, Justice.

¶ 1 This case requires us to determine whether Article 18, Section 5 of the Arizona Constitution, which provides that the defense “of assumption of risk shall, in all cases whatsoever, be a question of fact and shall, at all times, be left to the jury,” applies to an express contractual assumption of risk. We hold that it does.

I

¶ 2 Charles Phelps was a professional race-car driver who had participated in more than 100 races at Firebird Raceway, Inc. Before participating in a Firebird race, drivers must sign a “Release and Covenant Not to Sue” (“Release”) and a “Release…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  5. Nixon v. Missouri Municipal LeagueSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Flagstaff Affordable Housing Ltd. Partnership v. Design Alliance, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2010
  2. 1800 OCOTILLO, LLC v. WLB Group, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Lincoln General Insurance Co. v. Detroit Diesel Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  4. John Munic Enterprises, Inc. v. LaosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  5. Sonoran Desert Investigations, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API