Legal Opinion

Miller v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1932No. 23371PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKiNkade, J.

Sam Miller was indicted by reason of the fact that he had aided, abetted and secured the registration of one who was not a lawful voter in the district where the registration took place, because of the fact that the voter was under twenty-one years of age. Upon trial in the court of common pleas, the jury returned a verdict of guilty. Miller prosecuted error to the Court of Appeals, that court affirmed the judgment of conviction and sentence, and Miller prosecutes error here.

The prosecution was based upon Section 4785-201, General Code, which, in so far as it is applicable to this case, reads…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. ScottOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. ManleyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. GoodmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. State v. ManleyOhio Supreme Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API