Legal Opinion
Milano v. Hingham Sportswear Co. Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 13, 1974PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
The individual defendant, Peter Bruzzese (Bruzzese), appeals from a final decree which adjudged him guilty of contempt and directed him to pay specific amounts to named persons or for specific purposes.
In August, 1972, an order was entered in the Superior Court confirming an arbitration award against the corporate defendant. The arbitration award directed the reinstatement of five employees with retroactive pay and other benefits. Bruzzese was not a party to the collective bargaining agreement, and the arbitrator made no determination against him.
In October, 1972, a petition for attachment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Town of HudsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Emil Richard Yates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Parker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1942
- CrystalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- State Ex Rel. La Follett v. La FollettOregon Supreme Court · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Spence v. ReederMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Krokyn v. KrokynMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Fargo Women's Health Organization, Inc. v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Shipley Company, Inc. v. Darr (In Re Tap, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1985
- Advantage Bank v. Waldo Pub., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.