Legal Opinion
Crown Emak Partners, LLC v. Kurz
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided April 21, 2010No. 64, 2010, 85, 2010PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice.
This is a consolidated appeal from a final judgment entered by the Court of Chancery pursuant to Rule 54(b). This proceeding involves competing requests for relief under section 225 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”). 1 At issue is which of two competing factions lawfully controls the board of directors (the “Board”) of EMAK Worldwide, Inc. (“EMAK”).
Prior to December 18, 2009, the Board had six directors and one vacancy. On December 18, one director resigned, creating a second vacancy. The plaintiffs-ap-pellees contend that on December 20 and 21, Take Back…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Blasius Industries, Inc. v. Atlas Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1988
- Waggoner v. LasterSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- In re Giant Portland Cement Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1941
- American Hardware Corp. v. Savage Arms Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1957
- Schreiber v. CarneyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- In re Trados Inc. Shareholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
- In re MFW Shareholders LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
- Carsanaro v. Bloodhound Technologies, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
- eBay Domestic Holdings, Inc. v. NewmarkCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2010
- Brown v. United Water Delaware, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2010
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.