Corona, Admr. v. City of New Haven
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.
The trial of this action resulted in a plaintiff’s verdict for $1250.00, which the City moves to set aside, assigning as its reasons therefor the following:
1. The verdict was excessive.
There is nothing at all to this claim because the jury ac' cepted the claim that the decedent’s death was due to a fall she sustained on the day in question. The verdict was not only not excessive but, if anything, was inadequate.
2. The verdict cannot stand because there is no right of survival for death resulting from an injury caused by a defective sidewalk.
There may be something to this claim as a principle…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marino v. Town of East HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Prouty v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
- Cassidy v. Town of SouthburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
- Bilbo v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
3Cited by3 opinions
- Antrum v. City of New Haven, No. Cv88-0267211s (Oct. 4, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
- Montalto v. Sullivan, No. Cv97 05 93 37 (Jul. 8, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
- Roberts v. Givens, No. Cv 97 033 8945 (Dec. 29, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997