Legal Opinion
J. R. Watkins Co. v. Daniel
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 29, 1934No. 7 Div. 240PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
J. R. Watkins Company sued Leonard A. Daniel and others as guarantors for their principal, Louis N. Rose.
Rose entered into a contract in writing with plaintiff for the purchase of merchandise on terms of credit, and for the payment of an agreed past due indebtedness, time of payment being extended.
The written guaranty signed by defendants assented to and incorporated the obligations of such contract.
Defendant Daniel interposed pleas 6 and 7 setting up a conditional delivery of the instrument to their principal, an agreement between guarantor and principal that the latter…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- J. R. Watkins Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Anderson v. BlairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Board of Education v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- New York Life Ins. v. ScheuerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Furst & Thomas v. SandlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ideal Structures Corporation v. Levine Huntsville Development CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Furst &8212 McNess Co. v. KiellySupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- J. R. Watkins Co. v. StimpsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- J. R. Watkins Co. v. TurbervilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940