Legal Opinion

Floyd v. Green

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 4, 1939No. 4 Div. 62PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

There is but one issue in this case, and that is, should the deed involved be can-celled or not. If it is cancelled, then the other prayers of the bill, namely, sale of the property and distribution of the proceeds because of the fact that the property cannot be equitably divided, would be granted as of course. It was admitted by the appellees, Mrs. N. E. Green and Sam Caraway that the property cannot be equitably divided, and that the persons named as complainants and respondents below are the ones entitled to a distribution of the proceeds. They further admit that Chauncey…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Marx v. . McGlynnNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Harding v. WheatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  4. Allore v. JewellSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Bancroft v. OtisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Bank of Red Bay v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Holdbrooks v. Central Bank of Alabama, N.A.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Matter of Estate of BealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Webb v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. Jones v. BootheSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API