Legal Opinion

Eisle v. Woodin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 2, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crouch, J.:

Petitioner became a patrolman in the Dunkirk police department in 1917. He is an exempt fireman. He was charged with neglect of duty “in that he did upon January 21, 1922, suffer and permit liquor for beverage purposes containing more than one-half of one per cent alcohol to be sold in violation of the provisions of the Penal Law.” After a hearing he was found “ guilty of inefficiency and gross neglect of duty,” and was dismissed.

The Dunkirk City Charter (Laws of 1909, chap. 538, § 160, as amd. by Laws of 1917, chap. 637; since amd. by Laws of 1922, chap. 31) provides that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Search for & Seizure of Liquors Seized at Auto InnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  2. People Ex Rel. McKeon v. . LudwigNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. People ex rel. Reilly v. HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Matter of Byrnes v. WindelsNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Foran v. MurphyNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  3. City of Middletown v. City of Middletown Police Benevolent Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Matter of O'Kelly v. HillNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. Berardi v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API