Legal Opinion
Foran v. Murphy
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 26, 1973PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAbraham J. Gellinoee, J.
Having been found guilty after a departmental hearing of lying during an official Police Department investigation, Captain Philip J. Foran brings this article 78 proceeding. He seeks to annul the finding of guilt, and to vacate the forfeiture of 30-days ’ pay directed by respondent Commissioner.
The evidence at the departmental hearing established that in August, 1966, when petitioner was commanding officer of the police unit assigned to the New York City Department of Investigation, he met with Sergeant David Durk, one of his subordinates, and with Patrolman Frank Serpico. At that meeting…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cugell v. MonaghanNew York Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. NaughtonCourt Of Oyer And Terminer New York · 1870
- People v. Van Dusen, New York County Courts1967
- Gould v. LooneyNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- Eisle v. WoodinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Burka v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Marentette v. City of CanandaiguaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019
- Antinore v. StateNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- Folborg v. BrattonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996