Sidney Lamour Tyson v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

MEMORANDUM DECISION

KIRSCH, Judge.

[1] In this interlocutory appeal, Sidney Lamour Tyson challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the charge of Class D felony failure to register as a sex offender, contending that it was an ex post facto violation to require him to register under the Indiana. Sex Offender Registration Act (“SORA”) when, at the time he committed his offence in Texas, Indiana’s definition of sex offender would not have required him to register.

[2] We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

[8] On February 20, 2002, Tyson was adjudicated a delinquent in the state of…