Legal Opinion
United States v. Municipal Authority of Union Township
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 10, 1996No. Civil Action 1:CV-94-0621PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RAMBO, Chief Judge.
I. Introduction
On December 14, 1995, the court awarded summary judgment to the United States on the question of Fairmont Products’ liability under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (“the Clean Water Act” or “the Act”), 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., for 1,754 violations of its Industrial User Wastewater Discharge permit (“IU permit”), and 79 instances of interference with the Municipal Authority of Union Township’s Publicly Owned Treatment Works (“POTW”). The United States seeks the imposition of a civil penalty under 33 U.S.C. § 1319(d) for Fairmont’s violations…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Atlantic States Legal Foundation, Inc. v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Ca 79-3053 Publicker Industries, Inc. And Continental Distilling Corporation v. Roman Ceramics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Chesapeake Foundation v. Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1985
- Carpenters Health And Welfare Fund Of Philadelphia v. Kenneth R. AmbroseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Texaco Refining & Marketing, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Complex MacHine Works Co.United States Court of International Trade · 1999
- United States v. Smithfield Foods, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
- United States v. The Municipal Authority Of Union TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Gulf Park Water Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1998
- Bristol Technology, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.