Legal Opinion
Fidencio Resendiz-Alcaraz v. U.S. Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided September 10, 2004No. 03-13275PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACK, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner Fidencio Resendiz-Alcaraz, an alien present in the United States without being admitted or paroled, was convicted of a controlled substance offense in state court. The conviction was expunged after Petitioner served one year of probation. Subsequently, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) initiated removal proceedings against Petitioner, which resulted in an order’ of removal that was affirmed by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). Petitioner now asks this Court to review the removal order, contending he is entitled to cancellation of removal…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Jonathan O. Madu v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Mohammed Salim Ali v. U.S. Atty. GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Saleh v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Chadrick Calvin Cole v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Elkins v. ComfortCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.