Legal Opinion
Witcjak v. New Franklin Coal Mining Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 28, 1959No. 23402PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
The facts upon which these actions are based are stated in the Memorandum Opinion, pp. 2-4, filed on April 27, 1959, in the cases of Federal Insurance Co. v. Michigan Mutual Liability Co. (Newkirk Mining Co. v. Michigan Mutual Liability Co.), D.C.E.D.Pa.1959, 172 F.Supp. 858. By these motions, defendants, J. Robert Bazley, Inc., and Pennsylvania Power & Light Company seek to amend their answers to the complaint in the present action by adding the defense of assumption of risk. Defendants base their motions upon facts developed in discovery proceedings undertaken…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stark v. Lehigh Foundries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Kulka v. NemirovskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Childs Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- De Lee v. T. J. Pardy Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Federal Insurance v. Michigan Mutual Liability Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lester R. Cooper and Allstate Insurance Company v. American Employers' Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
- Richard W. Cramer and Stanley W. Cramer v. Ronald C. Hoffman, Robert Sheldon, James W. Littlejohn and St. Lawrence UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Green v. Sanitary Scale Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Harvey v. Eimco Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
- Green v. Sanitary Scale CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.