Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Turnquist

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 29, 1956No. 36,783PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dell, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial.

The defendants are the owners of lot 3 and plaintiffs the owners of lot 4, in block 35 of Northern Pacific Addition to Wadena. This action was instituted to determine the boundary line between said lots. The lots, as platted, are 140 feet long, 50 feet wide, and front on Third Street SE. The “Original Town of Wadena” lies north of and adjacent to Northern Pacific Addition. Both parties had independent surveys made.

J. E. Howard, a licensed surveyor and for many years the county…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Racine v. EmersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Engquist v. WirtjesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Dittrich v. UblSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Bjerketvedt v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. Fish v. Chicago, St. Paul & Kansas City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wojahn v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. CAROGA REALTY COMPANY v. TapperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. Aldrich v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  4. Donaldson v. KohnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. CAROGA REALTY COMPANY v. TapperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API