Legal Opinion
Helen J. Guercio v. George Brody (88-2013) and John Feikens (89-1137)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 13, 1990No. 88-2013, 89-1137PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.
Defendants-appellants, George Brody (Brody) and John Feikens (Feikens) (collectively, appellants), appeal the denial of their motion to dismiss plaintiff-appellee Helen Guercio’s (Guercio) complaint on the basis of qualified official immunity. The facts of this controversy were set out previously and the reader is referred to the circuit’s previous opinion for a full rendition. Guercio v. Brody, 814 F.2d 1115 (6th Cir.1987) (Guercio I).
In summary, Guercio, who had been discharged from her position as confidential secretary to then Bankruptcy Judge Brody, commenced…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- McGreevy v. StroupCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Paul Versarge v. The Township of Clinton New Jersey Annandale Hose Company No. 1, a New Jersey Corporation William Faust, IIICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Mcgreevy v. StroupCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Cook v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Moran v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.