Long v. Royal Insurance Co.

This is an action on an automobile insurance policy for tbe value of a motor truck. Tbe case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict for plaintiffs. From judgment entered on tbe verdict, defendant appeals.

Appellant has made some twenty specific assignments of error, but they all present tbe same question: Was tbe loss of tbe truck due to collision or upset, under tbe terms of tbe policy?

Tbe policy covered “actual loss or damage to tbe automobile insured, if caused solely by accidental collision with another object, or by upset . . . ”

Tbe loss of tbe truck was unique, at least in so far…