Legal Opinion
Ploe v. International Indemnity Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 21, 1924No. 18086PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
This is an action, commenced and prosecuted by respondent as plaintiff, to recover upon a collision clause in a policy of automobile insurance. From a judgment as prayed for, the defendant has appealed.
The facts involved are very little in dispute, and such dispute as exists seems not to be material to a correct solution of the legal questions upon which the case must be determined.
The provisions of the insurance policy (attached thereto by rider) under which recovery is sought, are:
“In consideration of an additional premium of $75.60 this policy also covers, subject to its other conditions,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- French v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Bell v. American Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Harris v. American Casualty Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
- Universal Service Co. v. American InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Kelly v. Fidelity Mutual Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Graham v. Public Employees Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Bruener v. Twin City Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Unkelsbee v. Homestead Fire Insurance Co. of BaltimoreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
- Frontier Lanes v. CANADIAN INDEMNITYCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Great Eastern Casualty Co. v. SolinskyTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.