Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Eschmann

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 11, 1959No. 13,269Published

1ConcurrenceLatimeR, Judge

(concurring in the result) :

I concur in the result.

My views on certain aspects of this subject may be found in my dissenting opinions in United States v Dean, 7 USCMA 721, 23 CMR 185, and United States v Jones, 10 USCMA 532, 28 CMR 98. See also my separate opinion in United States v Skelton, 10 USCMA 622, 28 CMR 188. Here, however, my associates extend the rules therein announced, for this law officer instructed the court-martial in the language of the statute and he gave the correct maximum sentence. See Article 63(b), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 863. We are thus confronted…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. CrusoeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. DeanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  4. United States v. PetersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  5. United States v. ReinerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API