Legal Opinion
Van Dyk Research Corp. v. Xerox Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 20, 1979No. Civ. 75-419PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LACEY, District Judge.
Van Dyk Corporation (Van Dyk) charged Xerox Corporation (Xerox) with violations of the antitrust laws. The case was tried before this court, sitting without a jury. A brief description of the contentions of the parties is appropriate.
Plaintiff’s Contentions
Van Dyk’s amended complaint charged that Xerox had violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. § 2) by monopolizing, by attempting to monopolize, and by conspiring to monopolize an alleged “office copier” market, an alleged “plain paper copier” submarket, and an alleged market in toner and developer. The…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rossi v. Standard Roofing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Michael W. Callahan v. A.E.V., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Van Dyk Research Corporation, a Body Corporate of the State of New Jersey v. Xerox Corporation, a Body Corporate of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Southern Pacific Communications Co. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- Xerox Corp. v. Comptroller of TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.