Legal Opinion
Ford v. Hubbard
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 6, 2002No. Nos. 98-56455, 98-56587, 98-80477, 98-80582, 98-80603PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*878OPINION
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge.
Richard Herman Ford, a California prisoner, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his two habeas corpus petitions as time-barred under the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (“AEDPA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). Both federal habeas petitions were initially timely filed in the district court by Ford proceeding pro se; however, both were “mixed” petitions containing exhausted as well as unexhausted claims. Along with the mixed petitions, Ford filed motions to stay each of them while he exhausted the then-unexhausted claims in state court. The district…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Andreas Kelly v. Larry Small, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Fred G. Stillman v. A.A. LamarqueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Paul Modrowski v. Stephen D. MoteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Joseph Hunt v. Cheryl Pliler, Warden Csp-Sac Cal Terhune, Director of the CDC California Department of Corrections California State Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- James Edward Smith v. J.M. Ratelle B. Kathleen BlanchardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.