Legal Opinion

Schelske v. Township of Orange

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1907No. Docket No. 119PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Kalkaska; Chittenden, J. Case by Otto Schelske against the township of Orange for personal injuries. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Plaintiff recovered in an action for personal injuries alleged to have been received by reason of the defendant’s neglect to keep a certain highway in a condition reasonably safe and fit for public travel. The case was tried before the court without a jury. Findings of fact and law were filed. No amendments were proposed, nor were any exceptions filed. The case is brought here on writ of error, and is presented under the single claim that the findings do not support the judgment. The findings were as follows:

‘£ First. That the highway in question was a legally laid out highway under the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McEvoy v. City of Sault Ste. MarieMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Smalley v. Ashland Brown-Stone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. People v. CurtisMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Myers v. CarrMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Peabody v. McAvoyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kowalczyk v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Walls v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API