Legal Opinion

Walls v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1912No. Docket No. 83PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Case by Edward Walls against the city of Detroit, for personal injuries. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

The plaintiff while driving his automobile on Dix avenue, in the city of Detroit, ran into a pile of crushed stone and sand, which had been deposited upon the pavement near the curb line by private contractors for the purpose of constructing a sidewalk. When the automobile ran into the obstruction, it overturned, and fell against a passing street car, throwing plaintiff out and injuring him, and he has instituted this suit to recover *613damages therefor. At the close, of the plaintiff’s proofs, the trial court directed a verdict for the defendant on the ground that the city was not liable…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McEvoy v. City of Sault Ste. MarieMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Schelske v. Township of OrangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beach v. City of St. JosephMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Kowalczyk v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API