Legal Opinion

Yeda Research and Development Co., Ltd. v. Abbott Gmbh & Co. Kg

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 15, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2010-1836PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge

What does it take to disclose a protein sufficiently so that it can be patented? After 20 years of litigation, the parties are still arguing about it. Abbott GMBH & Co. KG and Yeda Research and Development Co. Ltd. claim competing U.S. patent applications, each based on an earlier-filed foreign patent application. Abbott's application to patent the TBP-II protein was filed in Germany on May 9, 1989. Yeda filed its application to patent the TBP-II protein nine days later, on May 18, 1989 in Israel. From that few days’ difference in time…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  5. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arrowood Indemnity Company v. ThompsonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
  2. Laura Holmes v. FECCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  3. Nuriyev v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API