Arrowood Indemnity Company v. Thompson
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 ARROWOOD INDEMNITYCOMPANY, CASE NO. 3:22-cv-06016 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING ARROWOOD 9 INDEMNITY COMPANY’S MOTION v. TO DISQUALIFY COUNSEL 10 BARBARA THOMPSON, as personal 11 representative of the Estate of Charles McCarthy; C.C., C.L.C., S.C., G.F., 12 C.H., R.K., C.C.M., D.A.M., R.N., J.R., B.A.T., B.L.T., and S.W., 13 Defendants. 14 15 1. INTRODUCTION 16 This is a declaratory judgment action. Plaintiff Arrowood Indemnity 17 Company alleges it has no duty to defend or indemnify Defendant Charles 18 McCarthy…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Juan Albino v. Lee BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Wyatt v. TerhuneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. John Paul WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- PUD DISTRICT NO. 1, KLICKITAT COUNTY v. International Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.