Legal Opinion

Arrowood Indemnity Company v. Thompson

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided January 10, 2024No. 3:22-cv-06016Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 ARROWOOD INDEMNITYCOMPANY, CASE NO. 3:22-cv-06016 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING ARROWOOD 9 INDEMNITY COMPANY’S MOTION v. TO DISQUALIFY COUNSEL 10 BARBARA THOMPSON, as personal 11 representative of the Estate of Charles McCarthy; C.C., C.L.C., S.C., G.F., 12 C.H., R.K., C.C.M., D.A.M., R.N., J.R., B.A.T., B.L.T., and S.W., 13 Defendants. 14 15 1. INTRODUCTION 16 This is a declaratory judgment action. Plaintiff Arrowood Indemnity 17 Company alleges it has no duty to defend or indemnify Defendant Charles 18 McCarthy…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Juan Albino v. Lee BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Wyatt v. TerhuneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. John Paul WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. PUD DISTRICT NO. 1, KLICKITAT COUNTY v. International Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API