Legal Opinion

Beaumont v. Commercial Casualty Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1928No. Docket No. 62, Calendar No. 33,796PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, C. J.

Plaintiff is engaged in tbe city of Detroit in the business of delivering merchandise for retail and wholesale houses to their customers. He had insurance with defendant, which, among other things, covered loss by theft of goods in process of delivery by him. He obtained the insurance from Kelly, Halla, Peacock & Hughes, general agents of defendant for Wayne county, who had authority to issue and cancel policies, receive claims of loss and to deny liability when no policy was in force. Plaintiff brought this suit on the policy on account of theft from his driver on November 5, 1923, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Improved-Match Co. v. Michigan Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. American Fidelity Co. v. R. L. Ginsburg Sons' Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fidelity Casualty Co. of New York v. JacksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Blekkenk v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Petersen v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  4. County of Osceola v. Michigan Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Doshi v. Michigan Basic Property InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API